Is it really ‘madness’ to account for emissions from fossil fuels burned overseas? The Coalition sure thinks so | Temperature Check
Attributed to The Guardian. EcoAlaxy Finance is not independently verifying these facts. Information only — not investment advice.
Still from the source feed, not produced by EcoAlaxy Finance.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2026/oct/14/is-it-really-madness-to-account-for-emissions-from-fossil-fuels-burned-overseas-the-coalition-sure-thinks-so
EcoAlaxy Finance Summary
Single-source
The Guardian is currently the only allowlisted source on the desk for this item.
Missing information
- No second independent outlet is on the desk for this item yet.
What to watch next
- Whether the original outlet issues a correction or update.
- Whether a second independent allowlisted outlet publishes on the same development.
- Whether later excerpts change the numbers or the framing.
Claim states describe the source record, not independently verified truth. Green and cyan never mean “confirmed.”
Supporting passage from source
The emissions might occur elsewhere, but they generate global harm that scientists can now quantify Sign up for climate and environment editor Adam Morton’s free Clear Air newsletter here The Coalition has come up with the perfect solution to deal with the climate pollution from when Australian fossil fuels are burned overseas. We should either just pretend they don’t exist, or ignore the reason why people are concerned about them, even if those people include a majority of high court judges or the international court of justice. Sign up to get climate and environment editor Adam Morton’s Clear Air column as a free newsletter Continue reading...
More on Climate
Same topic on this desk, not a claim that these outlets agree. Each keeps its own original link.
Reader discussion
Comments are public only after review. Keep personal thoughts private in your saved items.
Sign in to join the discussion